WHAT'S A TURKMEN
Scott Taylor


July 26, 2005, Habur Gate, Northern Iraq - It had taken us hours to get through the clogged Turkey-Iraq border crossing and, were it not for some generous bribes and an intrepid driver, we would still be sweltering in the long lineup. While it is not my usual practice to jump a queue, in this instance a further delay would have jeopardized the scheduled rendezvous I had with American helicopters on the Iraqi side of the border.

When we finally reached the small U.S. military outpost at the expansive Habur Gate facility, the American soldiers there admitted they had no prior knowledge of our arrival, and certainly did not expect any helicopter flights. In true military "by the book" fashion, a staff sergeant condescendingly advised us that if we wished to visit U.S. troops in Telafer, we should try notifying the Pentagon first and then co-ordinate a travel plan through Kuwait.

The assembled soldiers lounging in the air conditioned cafeteria that hot day cordially offered us some cold pop and snacks, but it was evident from their amused glances that they believed the three of us foreign journalists must have been somewhat touched in the head by the excessive heat.

In this remote corner of Iraq, the U.S. garrison played no more than an observer's role as the actual border security was enforced by Kurdish warlord Massoud Barzani's peshmerga militiamen. The handful of American military police based at the customs house had made no attempt to intervene in either the issuing of visas or the collection of tax revenue. Two and a half years after the invasion to topple Saddam Hussein, the Kurdish provinces still operated as an autonomous region with no ties to the Baghdad central authorities. Not only did Barzani still maintain a private army, his Asaish (secret service) was also very much engaged in keeping their warlord in power.

Seated at a table pondering our next move, Sasha Uzunov, an Australian photo journalist, and Stefan Nikolawski, a Canadian documentary filmmaker, and I were approached in the U.S. cafeteria by a Kurdish Asaish agent. While the U.S. military personnel were prepared to dismiss our presence, the Asaish agent was intensely curious to learn more about our visit to Iraq. Having been detained and questioned by Barzani's secret service on previous trips into northern Iraq, I was amazed the Asaish would try to exert any kind of authority while inside an American military compound.

Not realizing the sensitivity of the situation, Uzunov engaged the Asaish agent in a friendly dialogue and advised him of our inten¬tion to report on the situation in Telafer - if and when the promised helicopters arrived. The very mention of the word Telafer started the Kurdish secret service agent to launch into a well-rehearsed diatribe about this little known city. When the Asaish operative tried to ex¬plain how Telafer was a "Kurdish" city being troubled by "Turkmen insurgents," I impolitely instructed him to "get the hell away from our table." Incensed at my tone, the Kurdish official grudgingly vacated his seat, moving a short distance away to where he could still monitor our conversation.

In order to enlighten my companions, I explained that during my previous 20 trips into Iraq I had grown weary of the constant Kurdish attempts to marginalize the Turkmen community with whom they share the northern provinces. I am one of a very few Westerners to ever visit the remote city of Telafer. On my second trip to this ancient city, in September 2004,1 was seized and held hostage by the insurgents who now controlled the city. For five harrowing days me and a Turkish journalist, Zeynep Tugrul, were tortured, threatened with death, and at risk of being killed by the U.S. troops that were engaging our captors in fierce fireh'ghts. Since that time, Telafer has remained a hotbed of resistance to the U.S. occupation.

Such a rare inside look at the Iraqi insurgency had revealed a number of things to me - one of the most important being that a small chapter of Wahabbists known as Ansar al-Islam were active in Telafer. What made this discovery such a shock was that I had spent a great deal of time and effort researching the Iraqi Turkmen and in the post-U.S. invasion anarchy, I had made a dozen trips into northern Iraq but had not known the extremist group was operating in this remote region. I was fascinated with the complexity of the political and economic landscapes that seemed to be a lit powder keg poised to ignite a civil war and possibly fuel an even larger regional conflict.

At the centre of this brewing crisis was the disputed control of the Baba Gurgur oilfields outside of Kirkuk. In the immediate aftermath of Saddam's collapse, Kurdish peshmerga had rushed south from their autonomous provinces to lay claim to the oilriches of Kirkuk. With Baba Gurgur accounting for about 40 per cent of Iraq's oil exports, con¬trol of this asset would provide the Kurds with the economic means to declare an independent state. However, such a development runs counter to the political interests of Turkey, Iran, Syria and Armenia - four countries that border on northern Iraq and have substantial Kurdish minorities with strong separatist movements. Making matters even more complicated for the Kurds is the fact that Kirkuk has long been recognized in the history of Iraq as a Turkmen city.

Although no formal census has been taken since 1957, it is es¬timated that the Turkmen number as many as 3,000,000 - or up to 13 per cent of Iraq's 27 million population. However, in Kirkuk the indigenous Turkish-speaking Iraqi Turkmen represent more than 50 per cent of a population that also includes Kurds, Arabs, Chaldeans, Assyrians and Yazidi.

During his 30-year reign of terror, Saddam Hussein successfully marginalized the Turkmen through his Arabification policies. For their part, Kurdish warlords have taken every opportunity to keep the existence of this significant ethnic minority hidden from the Western media. As such, Turkmen are routinely listed among "others" in any analysis published concerning the demographics of Iraq. Those study¬ing news reports from war-torn Iraq are familiar with the divisions of Shiite and Sunni Arabs and Kurds, but rarely is the term "Turkmen" ever seen in print.

To address this void, I wrote the book Among the 'Others': Encounters with the Forgotten Turkmen of Iraq. It provided some historical and political context on this community and, through the detailed account of my hostage experience, also provided insight into the complex networking of the local insurgent groups. In terms of international sales, Among The 'Others' was not a blockbuster, but it certainly has been widely circulated among the major stakeholders in Iraq - including members of the U.S. military.

One officer in particular, Colonel H.R. McMaster, took a keen inter¬est in the book. McMaster was the commander of the 3rd Armoured Cavalry Regiment, one of the most combat-capable units in the U.S. Army. During the initial invasion of Iraq in 2003,3ACR had played a pivotal role in crushing Saddam's forces. That was the role they were trained and equipped for, and the collapse of the Iraqi forces left them in the unfamiliar world of a burgeoning guerrilla war.

The U.S. troops had been promised they would be greeted as liberators and told they would return to America within six months. However, by the time 3ACR completed a full year tour of duty and had rotated home to Colorado Springs, they were advised that they would be redeployed back to Iraq within nine months. To prepare his men for their second tour, McMaster realized that a major short¬coming of his unit had been their inability to talk to the Iraqi people. In order to address this, the intrepid colonel ensured that each and every soldier in 3ACR mastered a basic proficiency in Arabic before returning to the Middle East.

By a twist of fate, the Pentagon assigned 3ACR to the Telafer sector. Very quickly the U.S. soldiers found out that their Arabic skills were useless when conversing with the Turkish-speaking locals. The officers of 3ACR were soon asking themselves, "What's a Turkmen?"

Soon after, Col. McMaster discovered my book Among the 'Others' and ordered his staff officers to contact me. Foregoing usual official Pentagon procedures, McMaster's officers called to offer me an "all expense paid trip to Telafer." In exchange, I was to provide the soldiers of 3ACR with a formal presentation about the Iraqi Turkmen and, in particular, the insurgents in Telafer. It was on the strength of this unusual request that I invited Sasha Uzunov and Stefan Nikolawski to join me in my rendezvous at the Habur Gate border post.

At 11:50 a.m., right on schedule, the distinct throbbing sound of approaching helicopters could be heard. The amused smiles of the GIs in the cafeteria quickly turned to awe as they rushed to the windows to watch the rare sight of a U.S. Army Blackhawk chopper land on a nearby soccer field as an Apache gunship menacingly swept across the rooftops. The Asaish agent was last seen making a flurry of phone calls as we hauled our gear aboard the Blackhawk and took off for Telafer.

The Turkmen were about to become a recognized piece of the post-war Iraqi puzzle.
Scott Taylor
Author and military analyst
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
March 29, 2006

TURKMEN IN IRAQ - A HUNGARIAN VIEWPOINT

My first visit to Kirkuk was in September 2003. At that time, members of the Iraqi Turkmen Front had assembled to choose its new leader to replace the departing Sanan Ahmet Aga. The congress of the delegates had been watched over by American soldiers. I can still hear the Turkmen community's applause that greeted the American military commander who was present that day. It is quite possible that the American would have been welcomed with just as much enthusiasm only a few steps away from this location, at the Kurds' headquarters. The same man, however, would not have risked his life by making a public appearance in Fallujah or Tikrit. I thought to myself, then and there, that history, which forms right in front of our eyes, is quite complicated. Sometimes it isn't easy to know which is the oppressor and which is the defender.

However, there is only one Iraq - if we believe that the peoples living together picture their destiny and their future in one joint state. For a long time, similar to other Western journalists, I had only heard of the Turkmen. But looking back, I am proud to say that, unlike so many people in Europe, at least I had not mistaken them for the Turkmen living in the former Soviet Union. It is a special experience for a Hungarian journalist to meet Turkmen in Iraq. Probably not many people know that the Hungarians have not always lived in their European country.

Our ancestors arrived in Hungary from Asia in the 9th century. A century later they formed a Christian kingdom. A considerable number of historians and linguists believe that the old Hungarians were actually Turks from central Asia, and that we are genetically and linguistically closely related to Turks of the world. We Hungarians express the words "pocket," "aubergine," and "apple" the same way as our Turkmen friends in northern Iraq do. I was delighted to hear that, according to my Turkmen friends, my looks are also similar to theirs. That could be true, but I obviously still have to take lessons in Turkish - after all, one cannot speak to one's relatives in English. For someone who loves his home and cherishes the memory of his ancestors, it is always a great pleasure to be welcomed by friends.

Beyond my personal feelings for the Turkmen, I sympathize with them concerning certain political matters too. Hungarians know very well what it is like to be a minority. Because of certain historical events, one third of our nation was forced to live outside the borders of Hungary. Regarding the situation in northern Iraq, it has to be pointed out that all peoples of the world have the right to have autonomy. The Turkmen, descendants of the old Turks, should play an important part in the government of the new Iraq. This requires a firm strategy, clear political faith, and hard work.

Although Kirkuk and other towns in northern Iraq are full of blue-coloured houses, the Turkmen people have still not occupied their rightful place in the community of nations. It is necessary to work harder, a lot harder for the world to at least be aware of the existence of the Turkmen. As far as I know, the work has begun, but it would be an exaggeration to state that decision-makers of the European Union would be able to mark on a map the whereabouts of the Turkmen or, as a matter of fact, those of the Shia and Sunni Arabs or the Kurds. This situation needs to change because the future of the Turkmen is at risk. It is clear that Iraq is not the same country as it was under the regime of Saddam Hussein. I can remember this thought coming to my mind when my friend Scott Taylor and I had entered Iraq from

Turkey in 2003.
We were greeted at the Kurd-controlled border of northern Iraq by a sign saying, "Welcome to Iraqi Kurdistan." The Turkmen should not have to fight the shadows of a dead family's empire, but instead should face the new challenges of the post-war era. The Turkmen must rely only on themselves, like they have so many times before in history. That is the destiny of all peoples with a small population. But we must not forget that "heart and free people can make great deeds," as a famous Hungarian poet once said. And only with strong heart can we gain freedom.

I trust that the Turkmen nation follows a path of wisdom, eventu¬ally becoming an appreciated member of the international community. This is in the interest of us all because benevolent people of the world hope to hear good news every day from Iraq, not tales of gunfire.

Ldszlo Szentesi Zoldi
Journalist and foreign affairs adviser
Budapest, Hungary
April 6, 2006


    info@turkmeninstitute.org